Leadership

Some­how it already feels like ancient his­to­ry, but the read­er per­haps remem­bers the hub­bub sur­round­ing the book Game Change when it was pub­lished eight days ago. Har­ry Reid was quot­ed talk­ing about Oba­ma’s lack of a Negro dialect. Sarah Palin is also depict­ed neg­a­tive­ly in the book.

Rei­d’s response was to stand up and admit he said what he said. And he apologized.

Pal­in’s response was to sim­ply state that the book was full of lies.

One might look at the two respons­es and draw con­clu­sions about who is lead­er­ship material.

On the oth­er hand, both of them respond­ed in the way that their pol­i­tics required of them. Pol­i­tics required Reid to man up and apol­o­gize. Pol­i­tics requires Palin to just declare the book to be lies. (Maybe they are lies. I don’t know).

With 63% of precincts report­ing, the Repub­li­can Brown is defeat­ing the Demo­c­rat Coak­ley in the Mass­a­chu­setts sen­ate race 53% to 46%. It is not look­ing good.

Now the Democ­rats are faced with the ques­tion of what to do with health care reform. Are they lead­ers or are they craven cow­ards to the polit­i­cal breeze.

TPM alerts us to the ear­ly leap by Indi­ana’s Bayh to cowardice.

The irony is that if the Dems lis­ten to the les­son of Mass­a­chu­setts and fail to pass health care, they will lose a lot more this fall then they will if they stand tall and pass the bill. They already vot­ed for it.

If Coak­ley does indeed lose, it prob­a­bly means the end of Cap and Trade. With luck the glob­al warm­ing deniers are correct.

Will we get lead­er­ship or politicians?

A Little Knowledge…

John Durant is a meat eater.  The New York Times has an arti­cle on his return to a cave­man diet. My under­stand­ing is that the New York Times will soon require mon­ey to access con­tent, so I will quote:

The one thing that Mr. Durant wor­ries might spook a female guest is his most recent pur­chase: a three-foot-tall refrig­er­at­ed meat lock­er that sits in a cor­ner of his liv­ing room. That is where he keeps his organ meat and deer ribs.

Mr. Durant, 26,…is part of a small New York sub­cul­ture whose mem­bers seek good health through a selec­tive return to the habits of their Pale­olith­ic ancestors.

Or as he and some of his friends describe them­selves, they are cavemen.

The cave­man lifestyle, in Mr. Durant’s inter­pre­ta­tion, involves eat­ing large quan­ti­ties of meat and then fast­ing between meals to approx­i­mate the lean times that his dis­tant ances­tors faced between hunts. Veg­eta­bles and fruit are fine, but he avoids foods like bread that were unavail­able before the inven­tion of agri­cul­ture. Mr. Durant believes the human body evolved for a hunter-gath­er­er lifestyle, and his goal is to wean him­self off what he sees as many mil­len­ni­ums of bad habits.

These urban cave­men also choose exer­cise rou­tines focused on sprint­ing and jump­ing, to repli­cate how a pre­his­toric per­son might have fled from a mastodon.

This diet is based on our cave dwelling ances­try. Fair enough. But it ignores evo­lu­tion. One of the first things I notice here is that a giv­en organ­ism is suc­cess­ful if his or her genes are passed on. Among cave­men, this would require a lifes­pan of thir­ty years maybe? Also it is my under­stand­ing that there is a pret­ty good body of evi­dence that red meat is real­ly not good for us (but I’ve not researched this, so don’t take my word for it).

As soon as I saw the arti­cle I remem­bered read­ing some­thing about evo­lu­tion and human’s diet. It was at John Hawk’s Weblog; a post enti­tled You are what your ances­tors ate, part 1. In this post, Pro­fes­sor Hawk briefly dis­cuss­es “report­ing on an inter­dis­ci­pli­nary con­fer­ence on recent human diet evo­lu­tion”. He quotes from an arti­cle in Sci­ence*. I give you the same quote:

The agri­cul­tur­al rev­o­lu­tion favored peo­ple lucky enough to have gene vari­ants that helped them digest milk, alco­hol, and starch. Those muta­tions there­fore spread among farm­ers. But oth­er pop­u­la­tions remained more car­niv­o­rous, such as the Saa­mi of frigid north­ern Nor­way, whose ances­tors herd­ed rein­deer. Among Saa­mi ances­tors, genes to digest meat and fat effi­cient­ly were appar­ent­ly favored. One gene vari­ant, for exam­ple, makes liv­ing Saa­mi less like­ly to get uric acid kid­ney stones — com­mon in peo­ple who eat high-pro­tein diets — than are peo­ple whose ances­tors were veg­e­tar­i­an Hin­dus and lack this gene vari­ant, says geneti­cist Mark Thomas of Uni­ver­si­ty Col­lege Lon­don (UCL).

In oth­er words, there has been more than enough time for humans to adapt to an agrar­i­an civilization.

I guess it’s pos­si­ble that Mr. Durant is descend­ed from the Saa­mi of north­ern Norway.

Final­ly, cred­it where cred­it is due, I found the New York Times arti­cle from the dis­cus­sion about it at Alt­house.

* The arti­cle is by Ann Gib­bons. It is unavail­able with­out paying.

History Repeats Itself Whether It Is Remembered Or Not

In the sum­mer of 1982, I was man­ag­ing a Domi­no’s Piz­za store that served a small col­lege cam­pus. I had tak­en over the store right after the col­lege had dis­missed for the sum­mer, so busi­ness was a bit slow. One of the first things I did was to chart the week­ly sales.

One Mon­day in July the super­vi­sor arrives with a bit of burn going on. He pulled me aside and asked me if I knew that the week just end­ed had had the low­est sales of any week so far that year. I just smiled and asked him to fol­low me to the office where I direct­ed his atten­tion to my sales chart. The week just end­ed had had the low­est sales of the year every year the store had been open. My sales were high­er than the year before (as they had been every week), but not high­er than the week before. I had no idea why that par­tic­u­lar week was his­tor­i­cal­ly bad, but it was.

That one moment made chart­ing the sales worth it.

In the off year, the polit­i­cal par­ty in pow­er los­es con­gres­sion­al seats. There may have been an excep­tion or two, but that’s it. The day the democ­rats achieved six­ty votes in the Sen­ate, any­one who knew any­thing knew that they would no longer con­trol six­ty seats after the 2010 elec­tions. All of the media talk­ing heads know this. But why mess with a good story?

There is a bit of dra­ma in Mass­a­chu­setts in the bat­tle for Kennedy’s sen­ate seat, but oth­er than that the only “news­wor­thy” items con­cern­ing polit­i­cal pow­er in the sen­ate reflect the dif­fi­cul­ty the repub­li­cans face:

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/01/mass-retirements-not-so-fast-dems-say.php

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/01/will-the-dems-lose-their-60-seat-edge-not-necessarily — -gop-could-lose-seats-too.php#more

But in the end, the Democ­rats will lose seats. It is the way it is.

I’m Back.

Mov­ing is a dis­rup­tive activ­i­ty. It made sense that I did­n’t get to blog­ging while we were actu­al­ly in the process of buy­ing and mov­ing. But we have been liv­ing here now since late Octo­ber and I am only now return­ing to the blog. We now live in a beau­ti­ful, old home in Fort Wayne, Indi­ana. I imag­ine there will be a few posts about the house in the near future.

Our com­put­er died while we were get­ting ready to move. So we live in a new (96 year old) house, with new com­put­ers, new isp, and now a new year.

Along with all that we pur­chased a new bed and had it deliv­ered as soon as we had pos­ses­sion of the house. We brought up a card table and a cou­ple of fold­ing chairs and then we spent a cou­ple of days here clean­ing before the move (not that the house need­ed much clean­ing, the pre­vi­ous own­ers left it clean). That first night we retired to the bed­room and turned out the lights.

But the room did not go dark.

We’ve lived in the coun­try for the past twen­ty years. At that house, when the lights are turned out at night, the room goes dark. Even­tu­al­ly the eyes adjust and one can bare­ly see by what starlight makes it through the window.

But not here. Here the room is still lit as the light from the street­lights comes threw the shades. A dra­mat­ic difference.

It is no big deal. We can sleep almost any­where. But it was startling.

I imme­di­ate­ly thought of my father.

I grew up in the same house my father grew up in. While grow­ing up, I nev­er even knew which room was Dad’s (Dad was­n’t much about telling sto­ries of his past). Then one day Mom made a com­ment about Dad not being able to sleep in a total­ly dark room because he grew up sleep­ing in a room with light from the street­light com­ing through the win­dow. Based on that bit of info, I have since assumed that Dad’s room was the room by broth­er had and that I moved into the day he left for col­lege (kind of rude of me, really).

This is what I remem­ber. I can not swear every detail is true.

Hap­py New Year to all!

Trig

When Sarah Palin burst upon our con­scious­ness, she brought her fam­i­ly along, includ­ing the baby, Trig.

The grand­fa­ther says Trig is named after his great uncle, a Bris­tol Bay fisherman.

I vague­ly remem­ber read­ing this expla­na­tion of the name at the time. I gave no thought to where the name might have come from beyond that.

On page 405 of Com­ing Into the Coun­try, McPhee is dis­cussing the cab­ins of Dick and Donna.

The shan­ty that Dick and Don­na use on stopovers in Eagle is only a lit­tle up from squalid…Their fish camp down the Yukon can be dis­cour­ag­ing, too – a dirty, fetid, light­less cab­in astink in aging salmon. These more man­i­fest habi­ta­tions long ago earned Cook a rep­u­ta­tion as a sloven – among peo­ple who have nev­er been here. This seclud­ed cab­in (his home of homes) is neat and tidy – in fact, trig.

Upon read­ing this, I imme­di­ate­ly thought about the Palin baby. Vis­it­ing dictionary.com I find the fol­low­ing definitions:

neat, trim, smart, or spruce.

in good phys­i­cal con­di­tion; sound; well.

to sup­port or prop, as with a wedge.

to act as a check on (the mov­ing of wheels, vehi­cles, etc.)

That is a com­pli­cat­ed four let­ter name. With luck the ironies will shift and mul­ti­ply as he grows.

Cash Not Always Accepted

Today we bought a house! Deb­by and I have been try­ing to sell the house we are in and buy a house we love. After much back and forth involv­ing var­i­ous amounts of mis­com­mu­ni­ca­tion, the buy­er we thought we had for our house backed out.

We love the house we found and Deb­by fig­ured out how to buy it even with­out sell­ing this one, but financ­ing changes were required. So there was plen­ty of nego­ti­a­tions with the bank and it was all worked out. Time was short. The real­tor was con­cerned that the sell­ers might not accept anoth­er delay of the closing.

The prob­lem is that the mon­ey has to be there. And it turns out that the bank would hold even a cashier’s check for a cou­ple of days. There was no alter­na­tive but to get cash. Deb­by went to the bank and with­drew the cash.* They put it in an enve­lope for her. She drove to Fort Wayne and pre­sent­ed the cash to the bank.

The teller exam­ined each bill.

Deb­by now has a receipt for the $400 that the bank has deter­mined may be coun­ter­feit and is deliv­er­ing to the Secret Service.

For­tu­nate­ly, the dol­lar amount Deb­by was giv­en was approx­i­mate and the $400 was not nec­es­sary to close.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly, we just might be out $400.

Some­thing wrong with that picture!

The bank informed Deb­by that there have been oth­er cas­es of coun­ter­feit hun­dreds in Fort Wayne recent­ly. In exam­in­ing the bills, the teller was focused on the date. I sus­pect that the bank has been informed to be on the look­out for bills of a cer­tain date and that some of Deb­by’s bills matched that cri­te­ria. It is pos­si­ble that the Secret Ser­vice will authen­ti­cate the mon­ey. At least, we hope so!

If it turns out that those bills are coun­ter­feit, then that means that one can­not be sure that the cash a bank gives out is in fact legal currency.

*This was not tens of thou­sands of dol­lars. Just sev­er­al hun­dred to cov­er the last bit needed.

Time to Do the Time

Roman Polan­s­ki raped a 13 year old girl. He accept­ed a plea deal. He plead­ed guilty to unlaw­ful sex­u­al inter­course with a minor.

Then he skipped out pri­or to sentencing.

That was 32 years ago.

It is long past time for Mr. Polan­s­ki to face a judge and accept his sentence.

I’ve seen much writ­ten about Polan­ski’s art and how he should­n’t have to suf­fer over some­thing that hap­pened so long ago. This is absurd on its face. He did the crime, his art is irrelevent.

I under­stand his vic­tim has said that she does not want the crim­i­nal charges pur­sued. The crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem does not exist to serve the wish­es of the vic­tims. Often a con­vict­ed crim­i­nal is sen­tenced to a pun­ish­ment that the vic­tim con­sid­eres woe­ful­ly inad­e­quate. With any luck, Polan­s­ki will be an exam­ple of a crim­i­nal sen­tenced to a pun­ish­ment that the vic­tim con­sid­ers excessive.

It Doesn’t Hurt…

…as long as I only pat my low­er back. Click the Mike Pence tag for my ear­li­er posts on this subject.

Mike Pence has not made any announce­ments that he is run­ning for pres­i­dent. But now he is in the top five!!!

The recent Val­ues Vot­er Sum­mit includ­ed a straw poll for 2012 and

For­mer Mass­a­chu­setts Gov. Mitt Rom­ney, Min­neso­ta Gov. Tim Paw­len­ty, for­mer Alas­ka Gov. Sarah Palin and Indi­ana Rep. Mike Pence each won rough­ly 12 per­cent of the 597 votes cast.

Huck­abee won with 29%.

The momen­tum builds.…

:)