Sarah Palin

by Rich Beckman on July 3, 2009

I guess Mrs. Palin had sym­pa­thy for Michael Jackson’s fam­ily. I come home and it seems like every­thing in my Google Reader is about Sarah Palin. There is plenty of spec­u­la­tion about why she is resigning.

I have seen argu­ments that her resign­ing the gov­er­nor­ship will not hurt her pres­i­den­tial chances in 2012, and I have seen argu­ments that her chances for the pres­i­dency are now fin­ished. I would tend to agree with the lat­ter. I do not see some­one win­ning the pres­i­dency when oppo­nents can point and say “quitter.”

Time will tell.

I have never been a fan of Sarah Palin. But I can see how she did well in Alaska. And I can see how she may have been good for Alaska. Alaska has 571,951.26 square miles and a pop­u­la­tion of 686,293 for a den­sity of 1.19 peo­ple per square mile. Plus, the state has large quan­ti­ties of nat­ural resources. Res­i­dents do not pay state taxes, they get a check from the state for their share of the nat­ural resource prof­its! (that’s social­ism if any­one cares).

Given those facts, how much state gov­ern­ment do Alaskans need? Very lit­tle. Palin’s ide­ol­ogy is min­i­mal gov­ern­ment. A per­fect fit.

When Palin was picked as McCain’s VP can­di­date, I had two prob­lems with her. I did not agree with her ide­ol­ogy and she was not pre­pared to deal with the issues of the coun­try at large. Yes, she had her ide­al­ogy and she had what she knew to do for Alaska, but she clearly had not given the issues of the coun­try as a whole much thought. I would want the VP to have spent a bit more time think­ing about Iraq, Afgan­istan, Israel, and Iran; health care, reces­sions, bub­bles, and fed pol­icy than can be done in a six month cram ses­sion while furi­ously trav­el­ing the coun­try campaigning.

I have no idea of what her plans are. And I wish her well. But if she is plan­ning to run for pres­i­dent in 2012 or 2016, I hope she uses the interim time to become famil­iar with the issues that a pres­i­dent may have to deal with so she can dis­cuss them with­out so much reliance on con­ser­v­a­tive boilerplate.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: